TrustedFirmsThe agency record
31/100TF ScoreLimited verified evidence · why?
Strongest pillar
Review integrity — 6/6
Weakest pillar
Ongoing delivery and maintenance — 0/6
Evidence freshness
3 Aug 2026
Checks run
7 of 20

What would change it: 13 of 20 ladder checks are still outstanding on our side. Running them is the largest single change available to this number, in either direction.

Measures how complete our evidence is, not how good the agency is. See the full breakdown.

  • ✓ Verified AI SEO specialist
  • Self-reported
  • Early profile
  • Evidence reviewed 3 Aug 2026

These are the firm's own statements, published as such. We haven't been able to confirm them yet.

Best fit
Consumer, SaaS, or healthcare brands wanting AEO tied to full growth marketing.
Not ideal for
Anyone who needs independently verified reviews before committing, wants a neutral, third-party-audited AI-visibility benchmark rather than a vendor-reported one, or wants a narrow AEO-only specialist rather than a full growth-marketing suite.
Strongest at
Answer Engine Optimization and Goodie AI tracking
What to verify
Discoverable contract length and exit terms did not pass — Not disclosed
Verified location
New York — US-based
AI-specific team
Not disclosed
AI projects delivered
Not disclosed
Pricing model
Goodie $495/mo; full AEO $2K–25K+/mo
Team size
Not disclosed
Delivering AI SEO since
AI/GEO practice since ~2024
Typical project size
Not disclosed
Founded
2016
Not yet confirmed by the firm

Researched and written by us from public record, before NoGood was asked. We have not heard back from NoGood yet. Nothing here is invented, but the details are stated rather than independently verified, and the firm has not reviewed them. If this is your firm, correct it — that is free, and always will be.

Editorial take

NoGood is genuinely rare in this set for having built its own measurement product — Goodie tracks citations and sentiment across four major LLMs in real time, which is more infrastructure than most agencies bother with. But the number everyone quotes about them, a 335% jump in AI-sourced traffic, comes from Goodie's own case study, not an outside source, and only one review turned up anywhere online despite a client list that includes Oura and Procter & Gamble. Ask for references before treating that number as settled.

Written by us from public record. It is not the agency's own copy, and the agency can’t edit it — claiming a profile adds a labelled right of reply, it does not replace this.

What they work with

Their tooling, and how we established each one. A tool a firm merely names is labelled as their statement; calling one a specialism is a capability claim and needs corroboration.

We haven’t established what NoGood works with yet. That’s our backlog, not a finding about them — an empty stack here means we haven’t asked.

Services

  • Answer Engine OptimizationNo public detail provided
  • Goodie AI trackingNo public detail provided
  • Paid mediaNo public detail provided
  • CRONo public detail provided
  • Lifecycle marketingNo public detail provided
  • Digital PRNo public detail provided

Capabilities we established

  • AI search visibility
  • AI visibility measurement

Evidence

0 publicly verified · 0 confidentially reviewed · 15 self-reported · 0 outstanding

Self-reported

The agency's own statements, published as such. Not corroborated, and not presented as though they were.

  • 4 LLMs — tracked in real time by Goodie: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 6 Aug 2026

  • Worked with Spring Health

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Worked with Oura

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Worked with Procter & Gamble

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Worked with ByteDance

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Clutch: rating not shown from 1 review

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 6 Aug 2026

  • No review profile found on Other aggregators

    Self-reportedStated by the agencyChecked 6 Aug 2026

  • Answer Engine Optimization

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Goodie AI tracking

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Paid media

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • CRO

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Lifecycle marketing

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • Digital PR

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 8 Aug 2026

  • AI SEO / GEO — 35% of engagements

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 6 Aug 2026

  • Other services — 65% of engagements

    Self-reportedSourceChecked 6 Aug 2026

Sources behind these statements

What the evidence actually is. “Publicly verified” reads very differently resting on a case study than on a pricing page, so we name the artefact.

  • Public case study

    4 LLMs — tracked in real time by Goodie: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity

    Self-reportedOpen source6 Aug 2026

  • Client reference

    Worked with Spring Health

    Self-reportedNo public link8 Aug 2026

  • Client reference

    Worked with Oura

    Self-reportedNo public link8 Aug 2026

  • Client reference

    Worked with Procter & Gamble

    Self-reportedNo public link8 Aug 2026

  • Client reference

    Worked with ByteDance

    Self-reportedNo public link8 Aug 2026

  • Review profile

    Clutch: rating not shown from 1 review

    Self-reportedNo public link6 Aug 2026

  • Review profile

    No review profile found on Other aggregators

    Self-reportedNo public link6 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Answer Engine Optimization

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Goodie AI tracking

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Paid media

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    CRO

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Lifecycle marketing

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Digital PR

    Self-reportedOpen source8 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    AI SEO / GEO — 35% of engagements

    Self-reportedOpen source6 Aug 2026

  • Service line

    Other services — 65% of engagements

    Self-reportedOpen source6 Aug 2026

What is still outstanding

  • 13 of 20 ladder checks have not been run yet. That is our backlog, not a finding about this firm.
  • Business legitimacy: 4 checks are still outstanding on our side.
  • Track record: 3 checks are still outstanding on our side.
  • AI SEO specialism: Discoverable contract length and exit terms did not pass (Not disclosed). 6 checks are still outstanding on our side.

Verification record

Strongest on track record, weakest on business legitimacy

  • Business legitimacy0 of 4

    Is this a real, trading, identifiable firm?

  • Track record2 of 5

    Has anyone outside the firm confirmed the work?

  • AI SEO specialism4 of 11

    Is AI SEO genuinely what they do?

How the TF Score is built

  • Business legitimacy0 / 12

    Is this a real, trading, identifiable company — registered, contactable and continuously operating?

  • Evidence quality and delivery record0 / 16

    Can the work be corroborated by someone other than the firm — named clients, reachable references, published results?

  • Independent validation5 / 10

    Does anything outside the firm's own website confirm what it says about itself?

  • Transparency3 / 10

    Does the firm publish what it charges, how long you are committed, and what it is actually doing for the money?

  • Evidence freshness3 / 6

    How recently was any of this last checked? In AI search a two-year-old finding is about a different product.

  • Review integrity6 / 6

    Are the reviews that exist relevant to this work and plausibly independent, rather than a wall of five-star ratings about something else?

  • Measurable AI-search outcomes3 / 10

    Can the firm say how it knows whether AI visibility moved — a named measurement stack, a defined KPI, and a result reported against it?

  • Technical AI SEO depthNot yet scored

    Needs a ladder check. Excluded from the denominator until it has one.

  • Defined AI SEO practice5 / 8

    Is AI search a named service with a named person behind it and a history, or a page added last quarter?

  • Editorial and content governanceNot yet scored

    Needs a ladder check. Excluded from the denominator until it has one.

  • Ongoing delivery and maintenance0 / 6

    Is there capacity to keep doing the work, and terms that describe an ongoing engagement rather than a one-off?

Total 31 / 100. This measures how complete our evidence is — not how good the agency is. A low number means we have less to show you, which is not the same as a firm being worse.

Clients

Who they work with

  • Startup / seed — does not
  • SMB — does not
  • Mid-market — does not
  • Enterprise — does not
Client-size focus
Not disclosed
Industry focus
Not disclosed

Named clients we corroborated

  • Spring Health
  • Oura
  • Procter & Gamble
  • ByteDance

Pricing

Model
Not disclosed
Published rate
Goodie $495/mo; full AEO $2K–25K+/mo
Commitment
Not disclosed
Typical project size
Not disclosed

What that means: This firm does not publish how it charges. That is common, and it is also the single most useful thing you can ask on a first call.

Reviews

What the reviews actually say

Only one review found on Clutch — thin independent validation relative to a client roster that includes Spring Health, Oura, and Procter & Gamble.

We publish no rating of our own, and reviews never affect this firm's position on any page or any badge it carries. We also do not reprint ratings from platforms that collected them for themselves — Clutch, G2 and the rest own that work, so we tell you a profile exists and send you there to read it.

Relevance matters more than the average here: independent reviews found.

How they say they work

  • AEO named as a core service, not an add-on
  • LLM visibility audits, technical AEO, entity signals, digital PR
  • Prompt-gap analysis: reverse-engineering buyer questions asked to AI
  • Goodie: proprietary real-time tracking across 4 major LLMs

source: agency's own published AEO service pages.

What we could see them ship

  • Named clients: Spring Health, Oura, Procter & Gamble, ByteDance
  • Headline "335% AI-traffic increase" stat sourced from Goodie itself, not a neutral third party
  • Only one review found on Clutch despite the client roster's scale

source: agency's own case studies, Clutch, third-party agency reviews.

Recorded from the firm’s own published material and named third-party sources. Stated, not verified — the difference is on every line of the evidence section.

Where they came from

Founded by Mostafa ElBermawy, a former archaeologist turned self-taught developer and startup growth advisor. CB Insights cites 2016; the founder's own account in a past interview says 2017.

Published research

No standalone benchmark study found. Goodie itself functions as an ongoing measurement product (citations, share of voice, sentiment tracking) rather than a one-off research report — the closest equivalent to original research in their public output. source: agency's own product and service pages.

source: agency's own product and service pages.

Record

Evidence last reviewed
3 Aug 2026
Checks run
7 of 20
Statements on record
15
Profile operated by
TrustedFirms — unclaimed

Change history

Nothing has been superseded yet. When a statement changes we keep the old one here rather than overwriting it — that’s what makes a review date mean something.

Something wrong on this page? Factual corrections are free and open to anyone, whether or not the firm is a customer. Tell us what is wrong.

Similar agencies for this buyer

Same category, same register, ordered exactly as the category page orders them. We do not compute a similarity score — that would be a second ranking nobody asked for.

Is this your agency?

Claim the profile to correct company details, submit evidence, respond to editorial findings, and view analytics.

Claim this profile